So I'm uncomfortable with both asexual and celibate labels. Why?
I feel more like I'm being practical than sacrificial. If you don't have to get mixed up in the morass of romantic/sexual relations, why on God's green earth would you? I think all people desire intimacy, but some of us just realize that sex doesn't have the market cornered on intimacy, and sexual relationships are not necessarily superior in the intimacy department. Unfortunately, a lot more people don't realize that, so relationships in the church are skewed from the ideal just as much (if in different ways) as those outside the church.
The church, the body of Christ, should be about real love (intimacy), but nowhere do people get as hysterical about the idea of intimate, chaste, male-female friendships as in the current church. It's unconscious and systemic. The book Singled Out picked up on it and painted kind of a beautiful picture but stopped before going nearly far enough with the analysis and suggestions. I hope the authors are working on a sequel. (Does anyone know of any other books that explore this practical aspect further?)
The church should be the place where people are a family, one body, intimately involved with each other's lives and not so LASER-focused on spouses and children to the exclusion of any other intimate relationships.
Yeah, I said it. It's pretty radical, I know, and it's hardly well-developed and well-thought out enough to write a book about. But when I look at what I know of the life and example of Jesus and the early church, I can't help but think that maybe it's true.
What do you think?
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Asexual Awareness Week?
Did you know it was asexual awareness week? Neither did I. How did people become aware of things before the internet?
Since I am now aware that there's an official category and stuff, I did a bit of looking at definitions, and it seems that I actually don't really qualify for the asexual category if it is strictly defined as a lack of sexual orientation. In real life, however, (on the discussion groups and forums), it seems that people who identify themselves as asexual are sometimes indicating a preference or choice to not participate in sexual activity (though some who identify as asexual do have sex usually for the sake of other people), so maybe I still qualify for the label.
Random fact from Wikipedia: "Currently the US states of Vermont[49] and New York[50] have labeled asexuals as a protected class." Who knew?
Conclusion: Since I've had crushes on boys, I think I'm technically not asexual. I guess celibacy is the word for me.
Thing is, I don't always feel comfortable with celibate, either, as the connotation is clearly of one who sets aside these desires for a religious purpose, and I don't really think that's what I'm doing. Wikipedia separates asexuality from it for that reason: "distinct from abstention from sexual activity and from celibacy, which are behavioral and generally motivated by an individual's religious (or other) beliefs. . .."
Not a eunuch from birth and not a eunuch for the kingdom of God (Matthew 19:12). Then what am I? And what should I be (doing)?
Since I am now aware that there's an official category and stuff, I did a bit of looking at definitions, and it seems that I actually don't really qualify for the asexual category if it is strictly defined as a lack of sexual orientation. In real life, however, (on the discussion groups and forums), it seems that people who identify themselves as asexual are sometimes indicating a preference or choice to not participate in sexual activity (though some who identify as asexual do have sex usually for the sake of other people), so maybe I still qualify for the label.
Random fact from Wikipedia: "Currently the US states of Vermont[49] and New York[50] have labeled asexuals as a protected class." Who knew?
Conclusion: Since I've had crushes on boys, I think I'm technically not asexual. I guess celibacy is the word for me.
Thing is, I don't always feel comfortable with celibate, either, as the connotation is clearly of one who sets aside these desires for a religious purpose, and I don't really think that's what I'm doing. Wikipedia separates asexuality from it for that reason: "distinct from abstention from sexual activity and from celibacy, which are behavioral and generally motivated by an individual's religious (or other) beliefs. . .."
Not a eunuch from birth and not a eunuch for the kingdom of God (Matthew 19:12). Then what am I? And what should I be (doing)?
Labels:
application,
argument,
celibacy,
discussion,
morality,
questions,
sexuality,
truth
Friday, October 28, 2011
Is asexuality getting popular? (No, really.)
I have discovered that I apparently have a label. There are even graphics one can post to proclaim one's proud membership to this group.
I'm not sure how I feel about that. Maybe now that they've taken my term, I'll have to switch to another. I'd hate to be painted guilty by association.
One might wonder how that would happen. Well, you see, apparently, this category is part of a new term people are trying to popularize. Back when I was in college, the GLBT acronym was thought to span the spectrum (outside of straight folks, who don't count because they're in the majority I guess). Now there's this new-fangled one I ran across while reading up on a controversy in the Young Adult novel world: QUILTBAG.
(I would hereby like to suggest that this acronym be made plural to include straight folks in the name of the diversity the folks who came up with the term claim to value.)
And have a Facebook group to prove it. So what are other folks in this strange group like? Feel free to check out some of their sites.
So I'm part of an acronym that also contains labels for behaviors I do not condone. What's a Christian girl to do?
I sometimes joke that the only thing worse than Christian young adults telling their parents that they're homosexual seems to be telling their parents that they're asexual. In our culture (even in the church), being asexual is a kind of perversion reserved for the crazies and/or the most holy (monks, mystics, martyrs, and suchlike). Mad people wired for self-sacrifice or self-destruction. It's threatening to believers and non-believers alike for someone to look and say, "You know, this game you all play so intently holds no interest for me, so I'm just going to go do something else with my time and energy."
I'm not sure what I think about being in a QUILTBAG category. In the church, we're taught that this lack of sexual desire is a spiritual gift, but spiritual gifts are given by the Holy Spirit to the Church to help us serve others, so where do a bunch of "secular" asexuals leave my theology?
Your thoughts?
I'm not sure how I feel about that. Maybe now that they've taken my term, I'll have to switch to another. I'd hate to be painted guilty by association.
One might wonder how that would happen. Well, you see, apparently, this category is part of a new term people are trying to popularize. Back when I was in college, the GLBT acronym was thought to span the spectrum (outside of straight folks, who don't count because they're in the majority I guess). Now there's this new-fangled one I ran across while reading up on a controversy in the Young Adult novel world: QUILTBAG.
(I would hereby like to suggest that this acronym be made plural to include straight folks in the name of the diversity the folks who came up with the term claim to value.)
"Nurul says: September 13, 2011 at 10:19 am
"Ooh, is that A in your QUILTBAG stands for asexual? Because if yes then thank goodness, someone remembers us! It seems like the world refuses to acknowledge that we exist."
And have a Facebook group to prove it. So what are other folks in this strange group like? Feel free to check out some of their sites.
"S.O. says: September 13, 2011 at 2:36 pm
"there’s a few discussion communities on this topic:
http://group-x.dreamwidth.org/
http://asexual-fandom.dreamwidth.org/
http://asexuality.dreamwidth.org/"
So I'm part of an acronym that also contains labels for behaviors I do not condone. What's a Christian girl to do?
I sometimes joke that the only thing worse than Christian young adults telling their parents that they're homosexual seems to be telling their parents that they're asexual. In our culture (even in the church), being asexual is a kind of perversion reserved for the crazies and/or the most holy (monks, mystics, martyrs, and suchlike). Mad people wired for self-sacrifice or self-destruction. It's threatening to believers and non-believers alike for someone to look and say, "You know, this game you all play so intently holds no interest for me, so I'm just going to go do something else with my time and energy."
I'm not sure what I think about being in a QUILTBAG category. In the church, we're taught that this lack of sexual desire is a spiritual gift, but spiritual gifts are given by the Holy Spirit to the Church to help us serve others, so where do a bunch of "secular" asexuals leave my theology?
Your thoughts?
Labels:
celibacy,
change,
debate,
homosexuality,
love,
morality,
questions,
sexuality,
spiritual gifts,
truth
Monday, October 24, 2011
Finding Love This Summer and other things I didn't really do
In other news, I got an invitation to "find love this summer on SeniorPeopleMeet.com."
Now, I know I am a young fogey, but I am a celibate young fogey, and I have no interest in romance with a senior citizen even if we would likely move at abou the same speed, be interested in the same things, and have lots of pain complaints and stories to share.
How do I get on these mailing lists?
Now, I know I am a young fogey, but I am a celibate young fogey, and I have no interest in romance with a senior citizen even if we would likely move at abou the same speed, be interested in the same things, and have lots of pain complaints and stories to share.
How do I get on these mailing lists?
Monday, September 26, 2011
More Dreams and Nightmares and Longing
.
Why would I look to a job that will be full of roadblocks, irritation, and the prospect of failure when I have what is most likely a steady, rewarding job right now?
I am
Why on earth would I possibly even think of giving that up to work in a place where Big Brother will be watching, and I would be hemmed in and repressed and have my integrity challenged, my freedom in Christ squashed by legalism and politics, and many things I believe in opposed? What could possibly be worth that?
I actually blame my current dissatisfaction on how close I came in the process last year. Because things looked so rosy, I slipped up and let myself think of what life could be like it my dream came true.
And that made it so much harder to come back to reality when the dreams got stomped. I had to admit that the idea of working in my current job for longer than it takes to pay off my school loans was . . . unpleasant. (Of course, at the rate I'm going, that will be at least 15 years anyway . . .) It is not a bad job, at all.
But I can't help how much I love teaching and how much I love teaching comp and how much I love teaching comp to students at small, Christian, liberal arts colleges and how much I wish I could focus my full vocation time on it.
I don't believe in Teaching Composition as a Holy Calling, but I can't help but feel that I will have wasted my life if this present situation is all there is to it. I can't help but know that there is more to life than this. I can't help but long for that more, even if I'm physically incapable of really reaching out and grasping it.
Maybe I'm just
greedy. When things were
bad, I was
content (often discouraged
but certainly content). Now
that things are "better," am I just
selfishly wanting more?
Should I be straining?
Or should I be settling?
All for the glory of God.
Harder in practice than
theory. Amen.
.
Why would I look to a job that will be full of roadblocks, irritation, and the prospect of failure when I have what is most likely a steady, rewarding job right now?
I am
- starting to pay off my tremendous debt (so slowly) (collected compliments of the OWCP).
- respected by my co-workers.
- appreciated by my supervisor.
- challenged but not too much.
- able to balance things enough to maintain hobbies, ministry, and a part time teaching gig on the side.
Why on earth would I possibly even think of giving that up to work in a place where Big Brother will be watching, and I would be hemmed in and repressed and have my integrity challenged, my freedom in Christ squashed by legalism and politics, and many things I believe in opposed? What could possibly be worth that?
- Tenure? Hardly. I won't even be considered for that unless I seek a pointless PhD, which I can't possibly do in my current haze of chronic pain and fatigue and reduced mental capacity.
- A full time, long-term teaching post with benefits at a small, Christian, liberal arts college? Well, quite frankly, those don't grow on trees, and even with the connections I have, I can't really hope to even try any other ones until I've been working part time for 15 years. And I don't think I can keep this two-job thing up for 15 years.
- A home closer to my family? As you know, that's not really a consideration for me, cheerful loner that I am. If I lived closer, I'd have to feel more guilty for still not visiting more than twice a year.
- Being able to say my dream came true, and I was able to leave work I was merely good at for work that I was good at and loved?
I actually blame my current dissatisfaction on how close I came in the process last year. Because things looked so rosy, I slipped up and let myself think of what life could be like it my dream came true.
And that made it so much harder to come back to reality when the dreams got stomped. I had to admit that the idea of working in my current job for longer than it takes to pay off my school loans was . . . unpleasant. (Of course, at the rate I'm going, that will be at least 15 years anyway . . .) It is not a bad job, at all.
- I indirectly help save lives.
- I directly help bridge communication gaps.
- I like my co-workers.
- I believe that doing anything and everything for the glory of God is my calling on earth.
But I can't help how much I love teaching and how much I love teaching comp and how much I love teaching comp to students at small, Christian, liberal arts colleges and how much I wish I could focus my full vocation time on it.
I don't believe in Teaching Composition as a Holy Calling, but I can't help but feel that I will have wasted my life if this present situation is all there is to it. I can't help but know that there is more to life than this. I can't help but long for that more, even if I'm physically incapable of really reaching out and grasping it.
Maybe I'm just
greedy. When things were
bad, I was
content (often discouraged
but certainly content). Now
that things are "better," am I just
selfishly wanting more?
Should I be straining?
Or should I be settling?
All for the glory of God.
Harder in practice than
theory. Amen.
.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Nightmare on Dream Street, Part II
So something close (but not as close as last time) to my dream job is posted again. After the grand fiasco that was the last time I applied (wherein I was rejected not based on my own merits [or lack thereof] or theology but because of petty administrative shenanigans), many would assume I would never want to even think about applying again. These many are sensible, reasonable people.
But darn it all if I'm not seriously considering applying again.
I've been wondering what this says about me and have come up with several options.
What are your thoughts? Any other options you think this obsession indicates? :)
But darn it all if I'm not seriously considering applying again.
I've been wondering what this says about me and have come up with several options.
- I am a masochist? I don't really think so, or the last 8+ years of chronic pain would have been enjoyable.
- I am stupid? The jury is still out.
- I am stubborn? Well, this is a proven fact. Is it possible that I am so attached to the idea of this dream that I refuse to give up on it even when it is obvious that I should? You bet it is. I just have to hope that if this is a bad place for me to go, I keep getting shot down until I get the message.
- I am . . . called? Whoa, there! I don't really buy this calling thing as it's flogged by modern evangelicals. There are things we're all called to do as followers of Christ (love one another, love God, serve one another, do all things to the glory of God, etc.), but I don't necessarily think the only people who can teach (or missionary [yes, I'm using it as a verb here for consistency's sake] or pastor or politician or sell or whatever) are those "called" to teach (or whatever). God calls us to be faithful no matter where we are or what we're doing. But is it possible that sometimes the Holy Spirit nudges us in a certain direction, and we should pay attention? Very probably. So is this something I should pay attention to, or is it just (see #3 above)? I have no idea.
What are your thoughts? Any other options you think this obsession indicates? :)
Friday, September 2, 2011
Fortune cookie smiles
.
"You have a basic
need for solitude some of
the time" makes me laugh
the time" makes me laugh
.
Do you think this is true of everyone?
.
Labels:
discussion,
loners,
questions,
solitude
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)